Côte d’Ivoire vs Egypt: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Egypt
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 31.87 against 31.1 in Egypt, a difference of 0.77.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 44th and Egypt ranks 46th of 52 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.38 | 32.56 | 1.19 | Egypt |
| 2010s | 30.59 | 31.99 | 1.4 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Côte d’Ivoire or Egypt?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 31.87 against 31.1 in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Côte d’Ivoire and Egypt?
- 0.77, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Egypt?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Egypt rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 44th and Egypt ranks 46th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.