Democratic Republic of Congo vs Cote d'Ivoire: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 33.19 against 31.87 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 1.32.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 44th of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Cote d'Ivoire in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.48 | 31.38 | 4.9 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 33.96 | 30.59 | 3.37 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Democratic Republic of Congo or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 33.19 against 31.87 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 1.32, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 44th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.