Chad vs Eswatini: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Chad
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 29.73 against 29.06 in Chad, a difference of 0.67.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 47th of 52 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.28 | 27.42 | 0.133 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 28.23 | 29.75 | 1.52 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Chad or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 29.73 against 29.06 in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Chad and Eswatini?
- 0.67, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Eswatini rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Chad ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 47th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.