Cameroon vs Egypt: Participation and Human Rights

Cameroon
32.02
in 2011
Egypt
31.1
in 2011
Cameroon rank
43rd
Egypt rank
46th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Cameroon
  • Egypt
010203040200020052011

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 32.02 against 31.1 in Egypt, a difference of 0.92.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 43rd and Egypt ranks 46th of 52 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Egypt Difference Ahead
2000s 35.12 32.56 2.56 Cameroon
2010s 31.79 31.99 0.2027 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Cameroon or Egypt?
Cameroon, at 32.02 against 31.1 in Egypt as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Cameroon and Egypt?
0.92, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Egypt?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Cameroon and Egypt rank globally for participation and human rights?
Cameroon ranks 43rd and Egypt ranks 46th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.