Cameroon vs Central African Republic: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Cameroon
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 34.44 against 32.02 in Cameroon, a difference of 2.42.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 43rd and Central African Republic ranks 40th of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.12 | 30.8 | 4.33 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 31.79 | 33.73 | 1.94 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Cameroon or Central African Republic?
- Central African Republic, at 34.44 against 32.02 in Cameroon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 2.42, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Cameroon and Central African Republic rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Cameroon ranks 43rd and Central African Republic ranks 40th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.