Burkina Faso vs Niger: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Burkina Faso
- Niger
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 57.06 against 55.2 in Niger, a difference of 1.86.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Niger ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 17th and Niger ranks 18th of 52 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.62 | 48.53 | 5.08 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 58.04 | 50.12 | 7.91 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Burkina Faso or Niger?
- Burkina Faso, at 57.06 against 55.2 in Niger as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Burkina Faso and Niger?
- 1.86, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Niger?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Burkina Faso and Niger rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Burkina Faso ranks 17th and Niger ranks 18th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.