Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Botswana
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 71.14 against 65.11 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 6.03.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 52 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.03 | 62.1 | 8.92 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 71.09 | 63.89 | 7.2 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Botswana or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Botswana, at 71.14 against 65.11 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6.03, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Botswana ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation β extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern β extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections β extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination β right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections β integrity of executive elections.