Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Palma ratio (before tax)

Luxembourg
2.68
in 2022
New Zealand
2.75
in 2022
Luxembourg rank
93rd
New Zealand rank
90th

Palma ratio (before tax) over time

  • Luxembourg
  • New Zealand
24681012192119712022

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 2.75 against 2.68 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1985 it was New Zealand ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 93rd and New Zealand ranks 90th of 113 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 2.41 3.63 1.22 New Zealand
1990s 2.58 4.52 1.95 New Zealand
2000s 3.1 2.62 0.478 Luxembourg
2010s 2.77 2.24 0.531 Luxembourg
2020s 2.6 3.09 0.4873 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palma ratio (before tax), Luxembourg or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 2.75 against 2.68 in Luxembourg as of 2022.
What is the difference in palma ratio (before tax) between Luxembourg and New Zealand?
0.07, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2022.
How do Luxembourg and New Zealand rank globally for palma ratio (before tax)?
Luxembourg ranks 93rd and New Zealand ranks 90th of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Inequality Database (WID.world) (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Palma ratio (before tax). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Palma ratio (before tax)
Source
World Inequality Database (WID.world) (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
113 places, 3,075 data points, 1820–2024
Last refreshed

The Palma ratio is a measure of inequality that divides the share received by the richest 10% by the share of the poorest 40%. Higher values indicate higher inequality. Inequality is measured here in terms of income before taxes and benefits.