Sao Tome and Principe vs Tanzania: Overall Mo Ibrahim index

Sao Tome and Principe
58.48
in 2011
Tanzania
58.8
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe rank
11th
Tanzania rank
10th

Overall Mo Ibrahim index over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Tanzania
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 58.8 against 58.48 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 52 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 57.52 56.71 0.816 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 57.63 58.93 1.29 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher overall mo ibrahim index, Sao Tome and Principe or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 58.8 against 58.48 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in overall mo ibrahim index between Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania?
0.32, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania rank globally for overall mo ibrahim index?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Overall Mo Ibrahim index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Overall Mo Ibrahim index
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Measures overall index on (a) Safety and rule of law (b) Participation and human rights (c) Sustainable Economic opportunity and (d) Human development.