Ukraine vs Zimbabwe: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Ukraine
4
in 2018
Zimbabwe
4
in 2018
Ukraine rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Ukraine
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 4 against 4 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Ukraine ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Ukraine or Zimbabwe?
- Ukraine, at 4 against 4 in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Ukraine and Zimbabwe rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Ukraine ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).