Sierra Leone vs Trinidad and Tobago: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.5 | 4 | 0.5 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.71 | 4 | 2.29 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Sierra Leone or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Sierra Leone, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Sierra Leone and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Sierra Leone and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).