Philippines vs Taiwan: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Philippines
4
in 2018
Taiwan
4
in 2018
Philippines rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Philippines
- Taiwan
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 4 against 4 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.
Across all 69 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Philippines or Taiwan?
- Philippines, at 4 against 4 in Taiwan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Philippines and Taiwan?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Taiwan?
- 69 years are reported by both, from 1949 to 2018.
- How do Philippines and Taiwan rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Philippines ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).