Peru vs Spain: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Peru
4
in 2018
Spain
4
in 2018
Peru rank
1st
Spain rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Peru
  • Spain
01234180019092018

How they compare

Peru currently reports 4 against 4 in Spain, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 176 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Spain ahead.

Peru ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 9 and Spain in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Spain Difference Ahead
1820s 3.2 1.4 1.8 Peru
1830s 2.22 1.33 0.8889 Peru
1840s 0 2 2 Spain
1850s 0 2 2 Spain
1860s 0 2 2 Spain
1870s 0 3.43 3.43 Spain
1880s 2 4 2 Spain
1890s 4 4 0 β€”
1900s 4 3.2 0.8 Peru
1910s 4 3 1 Peru
1920s 4 0.9 3.1 Peru
1930s 4 3.43 0.5714 Peru
1940s 3.2 0 3.2 Peru
1950s 1.6 0 1.6 Peru
1960s 3.2 0 3.2 Peru
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 4 4 0 β€”
1990s 0.8 4 3.2 Spain
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Peru or Spain?
Peru, at 4 against 4 in Spain as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Peru and Spain?
0, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Spain?
176 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2018.
How do Peru and Spain rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Peru ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).