Peru vs Philippines: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Peru
4
in 2018
Philippines
4
in 2018
Peru rank
1st
Philippines rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Peru
- Philippines
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4 against 4 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
Across all 77 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 2.86 | 4 | 1.14 | Philippines |
| 1950s | 1.6 | 4 | 2.4 | Philippines |
| 1960s | 3.2 | 4 | 0.8 | Philippines |
| 1970s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.8 | 4 | 3.2 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Peru or Philippines?
- Peru, at 4 against 4 in Philippines as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Peru and Philippines?
- 0, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Philippines?
- 77 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
- How do Peru and Philippines rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Peru ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).