Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Papua New Guinea
4
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
4
in 2018
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Papua New Guinea, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).