North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
North Macedonia
4
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
4
in 2018
North Macedonia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 57 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, North Macedonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- North Macedonia, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).