New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
New Zealand
4
in 2018
Tanzania, United Republic of
4
in 2018
New Zealand rank
1st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- New Zealand
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 4 against 4 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 58 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, New Zealand or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- New Zealand, at 4 against 4 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).