Lithuania vs United Kingdom: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Lithuania
4
in 2018
United Kingdom
4
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Lithuania
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 4 against 4 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 99 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Lithuania or United Kingdom?
- Lithuania, at 4 against 4 in United Kingdom as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Lithuania and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United Kingdom?
- 99 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and United Kingdom rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).