Libya vs Mauritania: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Libya
0
in 2010
Mauritania
0
in 2018
Libya rank
150th
Mauritania rank
150th

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Libya
  • Mauritania
01234195119842018

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 against 0 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.8 4 2.2 Mauritania
1970s 0 4 4 Mauritania
1980s 0 4 4 Mauritania
1990s 0 4 4 Mauritania
2000s 0 2.8 2.8 Mauritania
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Libya or Mauritania?
Libya, at 0 against 0 in Mauritania as of 2010.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Libya and Mauritania?
0, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mauritania?
51 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
How do Libya and Mauritania rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Libya ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).