Laos vs Mexico: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Laos
4
in 2018
Mexico
4
in 2018
Laos rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Laos
- Mexico
How they compare
Laos currently reports 4 against 4 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.86 | 4 | 1.14 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Laos or Mexico?
- Laos, at 4 against 4 in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Laos and Mexico?
- 0, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Mexico?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2018.
- How do Laos and Mexico rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Laos ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).