Kyrgyzstan vs Portugal: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Kyrgyzstan
4
in 2018
Portugal
4
in 2018
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Portugal rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Portugal
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 4 against 4 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
Across all 142 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Portugal |
| 1870s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Portugal |
| 1880s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Portugal |
| 1890s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Portugal |
| 1900s | 1.44 | 2 | 0.5556 | Portugal |
| 1910s | 1.33 | 4 | 2.67 | Portugal |
| 1920s | 2.67 | 4 | 1.33 | Portugal |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Kyrgyzstan or Portugal?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 4 against 4 in Portugal as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Kyrgyzstan and Portugal?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Portugal?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Portugal rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).