Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 4 against 4 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1921 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3.56 | 1.89 | 1.67 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 4 | 3.67 | 0.3333 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Kyrgyzstan or North Macedonia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 4 against 4 in North Macedonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).