Israel vs Poland: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Israel
4
in 2018
Poland
4
in 2018
Israel rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Israel
- Poland
How they compare
Israel currently reports 4 against 4 in Poland, a difference of 0.
Across all 71 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Israel or Poland?
- Israel, at 4 against 4 in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Israel and Poland?
- 0, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Poland?
- 71 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Poland rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Israel ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).