Iraq vs Romania: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Iraq
4
in 2018
Romania
4
in 2018
Iraq rank
1st
Romania rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Iraq
- Romania
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 4 against 4 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 84 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Romania ahead.
Iraq ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.6 | Romania |
| 1940s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1.6 | 4 | 2.4 | Romania |
| 1960s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Romania |
| 1970s | 0.4 | 4 | 3.6 | Romania |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Iraq or Romania?
- Iraq, at 4 against 4 in Romania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Iraq and Romania?
- 0, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Romania?
- 84 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Iraq and Romania rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Iraq ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).