Hungary vs Japan: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Hungary
4
in 2018
Japan
4
in 2018
Hungary rank
1st
Japan rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Hungary
- Japan
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 4 against 4 in Japan, a difference of 0.
Across all 140 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 1.78 | 2 | 0.2222 | Japan |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Japan |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Japan |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Japan |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Hungary or Japan?
- Hungary, at 4 against 4 in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Hungary and Japan?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Japan?
- 140 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2018.
- How do Hungary and Japan rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).