Hungary vs Iraq: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Hungary
4
in 2018
Iraq
4
in 2018
Hungary rank
1st
Iraq rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Hungary
- Iraq
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 4 against 4 in Iraq, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 82 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Iraq ahead.
Hungary ranks 1st and Iraq ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Iraq |
| 1930s | 0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | Iraq |
| 1940s | 1.33 | 1.67 | 0.3333 | Iraq |
| 1950s | 4 | 1.56 | 2.44 | Hungary |
| 1960s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Hungary |
| 1970s | 4 | 0.4 | 3.6 | Hungary |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Hungary or Iraq?
- Hungary, at 4 against 4 in Iraq as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Hungary and Iraq?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Iraq?
- 82 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Hungary and Iraq rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Iraq ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).