Honduras vs Lithuania: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Honduras
4
in 2018
Lithuania
4
in 2018
Honduras rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Honduras
- Lithuania
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 4 against 4 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
Across all 95 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2.4 | 4 | 1.6 | Lithuania |
| 1960s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Honduras or Lithuania?
- Honduras, at 4 against 4 in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Honduras and Lithuania?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lithuania?
- 95 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Lithuania rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Honduras ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).