Finland vs Mexico: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Finland
4
in 2018
Mexico
4
in 2018
Finland rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Finland
- Mexico
How they compare
Finland currently reports 4 against 4 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 101 shared years of data; in 1917 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Finland |
| 1920s | 4 | 2.4 | 1.6 | Finland |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Finland or Mexico?
- Finland, at 4 against 4 in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Finland and Mexico?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mexico?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1917 to 2018.
- How do Finland and Mexico rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Finland ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).