Estonia vs Myanmar: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Estonia
4
in 2018
Myanmar
4
in 2018
Estonia rank
1st
Myanmar rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Estonia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 4 against 4 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Myanmar ahead.
Estonia ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | Estonia |
| 1960s | 4 | 0.8 | 3.2 | Estonia |
| 1970s | 4 | 2.4 | 1.6 | Estonia |
| 1980s | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | Estonia |
| 1990s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Estonia |
| 2000s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Estonia or Myanmar?
- Estonia, at 4 against 4 in Myanmar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Estonia and Myanmar?
- 0, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Myanmar?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and Myanmar rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Estonia ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).