Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Libya
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Equatorial Guinea or Libya?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2010.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Libya rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).