El Salvador vs Slovakia: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
El Salvador
4
in 2018
Slovakia
4
in 2018
El Salvador rank
1st
Slovakia rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- El Salvador
- Slovakia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 4 against 4 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.
Across all 85 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 3.56 | 4 | 0.4444 | Slovakia |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, El Salvador or Slovakia?
- El Salvador, at 4 against 4 in Slovakia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between El Salvador and Slovakia?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovakia?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Slovakia rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- El Salvador ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).