Dominican Republic vs Trinidad and Tobago: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Dominican Republic
4
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
4
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 53 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Dominican Republic or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Dominican Republic, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).