Dominican Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Dominican Republic
4
in 2018
Papua New Guinea
4
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 4 against 4 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Dominican Republic or Papua New Guinea?
- Dominican Republic, at 4 against 4 in Papua New Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).