Cuba vs Montenegro: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Cuba
4
in 2018
Montenegro
4
in 2018
Cuba rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Cuba
- Montenegro
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 4 against 4 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 86 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Montenegro in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 4 | 1.89 | 2.11 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 4 | 3.67 | 0.3333 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Montenegro |
| 1970s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Montenegro |
| 1980s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Montenegro |
| 1990s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Montenegro |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 4 | 2.4 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Cuba or Montenegro?
- Cuba, at 4 against 4 in Montenegro as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Cuba and Montenegro?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Montenegro?
- 86 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Montenegro rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Cuba ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).