Croatia vs Greece: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Croatia
4
in 2018
Greece
4
in 2018
Croatia rank
1st
Greece rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Croatia
- Greece
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 4 against 4 in Greece, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 86 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Greece ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and Greece ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Greece in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1.86 | 2.71 | 0.8571 | Greece |
| 1930s | 1.5 | 4 | 2.5 | Greece |
| 1940s | 3.67 | 4 | 0.3333 | Greece |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 4 | 2.22 | 1.78 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Croatia or Greece?
- Croatia, at 4 against 4 in Greece as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Croatia and Greece?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Greece?
- 86 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and Greece rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Greece ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).