Côte d'Ivoire vs Turkmenistan: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Côte d'Ivoire
4
in 2018
Turkmenistan
4
in 2018
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Turkmenistan rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 4 against 4 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 50 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 3.6 | 4 | 0.4 | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Côte d'Ivoire or Turkmenistan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 4 against 4 in Turkmenistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Côte d'Ivoire and Turkmenistan?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Turkmenistan?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Turkmenistan rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).