Côte d'Ivoire vs El Salvador: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- El Salvador
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 4 against 4 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 3.6 | 0.4 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 3.6 | 4 | 0.4 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Côte d'Ivoire or El Salvador?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 4 against 4 in El Salvador as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Côte d'Ivoire and El Salvador?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and El Salvador?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and El Salvador rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and El Salvador ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).