Democratic Republic of Congo vs Spain: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Spain
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 4 against 4 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 1970s | 4 | 1.14 | 2.86 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Spain?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 4 against 4 in Spain as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Spain?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Spain?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Spain rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).