Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
4
in 2018
Denmark
4
in 2018
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
1st
Denmark rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Denmark
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 4 against 4 in Denmark, a difference of 0.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Denmark?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 4 against 4 in Denmark as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).