Comoros vs Rwanda: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Comoros
0
in 2018
Rwanda
0
in 2018
Comoros rank
150th
Rwanda rank
150th

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Rwanda
01234196119892018

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0 against 0 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 4 0 4 Comoros
1980s 4 0 4 Comoros
1990s 3.56 0 3.56 Comoros
2000s 1.6 0 1.6 Comoros
2010s 3.56 0 3.56 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Comoros or Rwanda?
Comoros, at 0 against 0 in Rwanda as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Comoros and Rwanda?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Rwanda?
43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
How do Comoros and Rwanda rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Comoros ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).