Chile vs Cuba: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Chile
4
in 2018
Cuba
4
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Cuba rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Chile
  • Cuba
01234181819182018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 4 against 4 in Cuba, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Cuba Difference Ahead
1900s 4 4 0 β€”
1910s 4 4 0 β€”
1920s 4 4 0 β€”
1930s 4 4 0 β€”
1940s 4 4 0 β€”
1950s 4 4 0 β€”
1960s 4 0 4 Chile
1970s 1.2 0 1.2 Chile
1980s 0.4 0 0.4 Chile
1990s 4 0 4 Chile
2000s 4 1.6 2.4 Chile
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Chile or Cuba?
Chile, at 4 against 4 in Cuba as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Chile and Cuba?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cuba?
111 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2018.
How do Chile and Cuba rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Chile ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).