Canada vs Cuba: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Canada
4
in 2018
Cuba
4
in 2018
Canada rank
1st
Cuba rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Canada
- Cuba
How they compare
Canada currently reports 4 against 4 in Cuba, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Canada ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Canada |
| 1970s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Canada |
| 1980s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Canada |
| 1990s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Canada |
| 2000s | 4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | Canada |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Canada or Cuba?
- Canada, at 4 against 4 in Cuba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Canada and Cuba?
- 0, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Cuba?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Cuba rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Canada ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).