Cameroon vs Uganda: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cameroon
0
in 2018
Uganda
0
in 2018
Cameroon rank
150th
Uganda rank
150th

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Uganda
01234196019892018

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 against 0 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.

Cameroon ranks 150th and Uganda ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 4 4 0
1970s 4 0.4444 3.56 Cameroon
1980s 4 2.22 1.78 Cameroon
1990s 0.8 0 0.8 Cameroon
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Cameroon or Uganda?
Cameroon, at 0 against 0 in Uganda as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Cameroon and Uganda?
0, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
How do Cameroon and Uganda rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Cameroon ranks 150th and Uganda ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).