Cambodia vs Libya: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cambodia
0
in 2018
Libya
0
in 2010
Cambodia rank
150th
Libya rank
150th

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Libya
01234195119842018

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1955 it was Libya ahead.

Cambodia ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Libya Difference Ahead
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 1.8 0.2 Cambodia
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 2.29 0 2.29 Cambodia
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Cambodia or Libya?
Cambodia, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Cambodia and Libya?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Libya?
39 years are reported by both, from 1955 to 2010.
How do Cambodia and Libya rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Cambodia ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).