Burkina Faso vs Trinidad and Tobago: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 56 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | 0.8889 | 4 | 3.11 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 1.78 | 4 | 2.22 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Burkina Faso or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Burkina Faso, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Burkina Faso and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).