Burkina Faso vs Honduras: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Honduras
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4 against 4 in Honduras, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Honduras in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4 | 0 | 2.4 | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 0.8889 | 0 | 0.8889 | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Honduras |
| 1990s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Honduras |
| 2000s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Honduras |
| 2010s | 1.78 | 4 | 2.22 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Burkina Faso or Honduras?
- Burkina Faso, at 4 against 4 in Honduras as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Honduras rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).