Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4
in 1991
Papua New Guinea
4
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4 against 4 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Papua New Guinea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4 against 4 in Papua New Guinea as of 1991.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).