Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Republic of Moldova: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4
in 1991
Republic of Moldova
4
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4 against 4 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Republic of Moldova?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4 against 4 in Republic of Moldova as of 1991.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1945 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).