Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chile
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4 against 4 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Chile ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1.88 | 4 | 2.12 | Chile |
| 1930s | 1.5 | 4 | 2.5 | Chile |
| 1940s | 3.67 | 4 | 0.3333 | Chile |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 1.2 | 2.8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 4 | 0.4 | 3.6 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4 against 4 in Chile as of 1991.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).