Bolivia vs Croatia: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bolivia
4
in 2018
Croatia
4
in 2018
Bolivia rank
1st
Croatia rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bolivia
- Croatia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 4 against 4 in Croatia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 4 | 1.89 | 2.11 | Bolivia |
| 1930s | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | Bolivia |
| 1940s | 4 | 3.67 | 0.3333 | Bolivia |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1.6 | 4 | 2.4 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 3.2 | 4 | 0.8 | Croatia |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Bolivia or Croatia?
- Bolivia, at 4 against 4 in Croatia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Bolivia and Croatia?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Croatia?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Bolivia and Croatia rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Bolivia ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).